At a meeting of the International Project Management Convocation (IProMco) this month, the Board ruled there was no need for projects to have a project sponsor.
The Board suggested that as the role was not being played out fully by project sponsors then it was ‘unnecessary.’ In addition, the amount of project sponsorship training has fallen dramatically over the last 24 months. There were some heated debates and on a day when temperatures outside were a hot 40 degrees Celsius inside temperatures really rose as did tempers. The hosting delegation from Australia nearly walked out. They were however stopped when the Chair cited an obscure ruling.
The conclusion from the Board and ratified by the Senior Executive Committee was that because sponsors failed to carry out their role effectively and training was falling it should cease to be an ‘official’ position in project management. The formal date for this to take place is 1 June, 2018.
The Board of IProMco said that there are some great advantages for project managers:
It will enable the project manager to make go/no go decisions. The sponsor only gets in the way so the project manager can easily cover this off!
They can take real risks – sponsorship reduces risk taking and stifles innovation!
IProMco suggest that there will be Time saving: this is as a result of the project manager being in two positions delivering the project alongside monitoring the project
The results of IProMco decision will take a while however it will be far reaching in its consequences.
I have one major question: who has done a benefits management study on this decision?
Image: Original image from Google Images amended labelled for use with modification
The post OFFICIAL! Project sponsorship has been declared null and void. appeared first on Ron Rosenhead.